S-1 plus gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with S

来源 :World Journal of Gastroenterology | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:aiwaner
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy(intensity modulated radiotherapy,IMRT) and maintenance therapy with S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.METHODS:Subjects selected in the study were patients who had unresectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases,adequate organ and marrow functions,an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and no prior anticancer therapy. Initially the subjects received two cycles of chemotherapy,oral administration of S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-d cycle,with 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8. Two weeks after the completion of chemotherapy,S-1 was administered orally with concurrent IMRT. Oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2 per day twice daily from day 1 to day 14 and from day 22 to day 35. Radiation was concurrently delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy(1.8 Gy/d,5 times per week,28 fractions). One month after the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy,S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2 per day twice daily for 14 d,followed by a 14-d rest period. This cycle was repeated as maintenance therapy,until unacceptable toxicity occurred or the disease worsened. Thirty-two patients were involved in this study. The median followup was 15.6 mo(range:8.6-32.3 mo).RESULTS:Thirty-two patients completed the scheduled course of chemotherapy,while 30 patients(93.8%) received chemoradiotherapy with two patients ceasing to continue with radiotherapy. The major toxic effects were nausea and leukopenia. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria,the objective tumor response was partial response in 17(53.1%) patients,stable disease in 9(28.1%),and progressive disease in 6(18.8%). The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 15.2 mo and 9.3 mo,respectively. The survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 34.4%,respectively.CONCLUSION:The combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with IMRT and maintenance therapy with S-1 alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer may be considered a well-tolerated,promising treatment regimen. AIM: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and maintenance therapy with S-1 for advanced advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Subjects selected in the study were patients who had unresectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases, adequate organ and marrow functions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and no prior anticancer therapy. Initially the subjects received two cycles of chemotherapy, oral administration of S-1 40 mg / m2 twice daily from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-d cycle, with 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg / m2 on day 1 and day 8. Two weeks after the completion of chemotherapy , S-1 was administered orally with concurrent IMRT. Oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg / m2 per day twice daily from day 1 to day 14 and from day 22 to day 35. Radiation was concurrently delivered a ta dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy / d, 5 times per week, 28 fractions). One month after the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg / m2 per day twice daily for 14 This cycle was repeated as maintenance therapy, until unacceptable toxicity occurred or the disease worsened. Thirty-two patients were involved in this study. The median followup was 15.6 mo (range: 8.6-32.3 there were 30 patients (93.8%) receiving chemoradiotherapy with two patients ceasing to continue with radiotherapy. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, the objective tumor response was partial response in 17 (53.1%) patients, stable disease in 9 (28.1%), and progressive disease in 6 (18.8%). The median overall survival and median progression-freThe survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 34.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with IMRT and maintenance therapy with S-1 alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer may be considered well-tolerated, promising treatment regimen.
其他文献
目的:对广安市无偿献血人群结构情况进行回顾性统计分析,为更好的招募自愿无偿献血,建立稳定的献血队伍提供科学依据。方法对2012-2014年在广安市参加无偿献血的48340人次资料进
目的 分析病历错误及缺陷,找出对策,从而提高病案质量,提高医院的医疗水平.方法 随机抽取归档病历进行评级和缺陷检查,并对错误及缺陷进行统计.结果 外科病历、运行病历的质
本文介绍了惠安县骨干水利工程现状,并就如何面对水源短缺,选择具有特色的水利工程管理改革发展的新路子进行了探索.
目的:探讨系统心理护理在儿科护理中的应用。方法:选取2014年9月至2015年3月门诊治疗的100名患儿,分为观察组和对照组,各50例,比较两组护理效果。结果:系统的心理护理改革后,满意度
本文通过对低能核反应中产生的Al的测量探讨了利用AMS测量低能核反应裁面的测量方法,旨在为解决天体中Al的疑难和建立天体模型提供数据.
为了解我部所属3所医院卫生技术干部队伍的现状,我们采取实地调研的方法,对其年龄、学历、专业岗位等情况进行了调查。现分析报告如下。1基本情况1.1调查结果(1)年龄结构:现
目的:探讨对糖尿病患者早期进行抗氧化治疗的临床体会。方法:将80例患者随机分为两组,每组40例,两组患者均常规给予药物或胰岛素控制血糖在理想范围,治疗组同时加用普罗布考抗氧化
本文首先介绍了福建水利经济发展现状及存在的主要问题,并提出21世纪福建水利经济发展的目标及措施建议.
目前R&D项目的研究大多以数学规划、决策理论及评分方法来构建R&D项目投资组合的多准则模型。这些模型在有限范围内考虑是有效的,然而对于R&D项目的调度问题,是这些方法所不
本文介绍了泉州水利建设面临的主要问题,并对搞好综合开发、科学管理和优化配置方面提出了从工程水利转向资源水利的五条对策.