论文部分内容阅读
近日,广州市民不满硬座票与无座票价格相同,依据<合同法》和<消费者权益保护法》状告广深铁路公司。请求法院判决铁路公司将其购买的K9004次无座火车票(从深圳站到韶关东站)的价格由85.5元变更为42.75元,并返还多收取的42.75元票款。据悉,广州铁路运输法院当场立案,该案定于3月6日开庭审理。该市民称,能否胜诉并不重要,更重要的是诉讼过程能提
Recently, Guangzhou residents dissatisfied with the same hard seat tickets and no ticket prices, according to the “Contract Law” and “Consumer Protection Law” sued Guangshen Railway Company. Requesting the court to decide that the price of the K9004 no-seat train ticket (from Shenzhen Station to Shaoguan East Station) purchased by the railway company was changed from 85.5 yuan to 42.75 yuan and the overcharged 42.75 yuan ticket was returned. It is reported that Guangzhou Railway Transport Court on the spot filing, the case is scheduled for March 6 hearing. The public said the victory is not important, more importantly, the proceedings can mention