论文部分内容阅读
刑事裁判文书的说理直接影响到当事人与公诉机关的胜败皆服,直接关系到司法的公正性和权威性,与司法公信力的提升休戚相关。因此,非常有必要针对当前刑事裁判文书说理进行详细的调查与分析。目前,当事人及其诉讼代理人、辩护人、公众、法官、专家学者对我国刑事裁判文书说理普遍认为有待提高。面对当前刑事裁判文书说理在认定事实、法律适用等方面存在的主要问题,迫切需要我们在历史、制度、客观现实中探寻原因。针对刑事裁判文书说理存在的主要问题与原因,可以从“如何说理”、“怎么说理”角度,对刑事裁判文书说理进行了周密的探讨,同时,可以从观念理念上的更新、完善制度、提高刑事法官说理的能力案件等方面入手,构建起一条充分保障我国司法公信力提升的新路径。
The principle of criminal adjudication documents has a direct impact on the success or failure of the parties and the public prosecutor’s organs, which is directly related to the impartiality and authority of the judiciary and is closely related to the promotion of judicial credibility. Therefore, it is very necessary to conduct a detailed investigation and analysis of the current theory of criminal arbitration instruments. At present, the parties and their litigants, defenders, the public, judges, experts and scholars generally believe that China’s criminal arbitration instruments need to be improved. In the face of the main problems existing in the justification of the criminal prosecution instruments, such as the facts ascertained and the application of law, we urgently need us to explore the reasons in history, system and objective reality. In view of the main problems and reasons of the reasoning of the instruments of criminal arbitration, we can make a thorough discussion on the rationality of the instruments of criminal arbitration from the perspective of “how to deal with ” and “how ”, at the same time, from the concept of concept updates, Improve the system and improve the ability of criminal judges to handle cases and other aspects to establish a full protection of our judicial credibility to enhance the new path.