论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析比较四种检验方法检验阴道念珠菌病的效果。方法:选取在笔者所在医院妇产科就诊的阴道炎患者130例,通过棉拭子法收集患者的阴道分泌物作为检验样本。分别应用手工法、凝集法、显色法以及妇科白带涂片多项检查快速染色技术(CTB染色法)进行检验,并比较四种检验方法的检验结果。结果:CTB染色法的阳性率明显高于其他3种检验方法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:CTB染色技术具有操作简便、细菌的检出率高等优点,可以为临床诊断阴道念珠菌病提供可靠的诊断依据,值得在临床上进一步推广应用。
Objective: To analyze and compare the efficacy of four test methods to test vaginal candidiasis. Methods: 130 cases of vaginitis were selected in the obstetrics and gynecology department of the author’s hospital. The patients’ vaginal secretions were collected by cotton swab method as the test sample. The manual method, agglutination method, colorimetric method and the gynecological leucorrhea smear multiple fast staining technique (CTB staining method) were used to test, and the test results of the four test methods were compared. Results: The positive rate of CTB staining was significantly higher than the other three test methods, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: CTB staining has the advantages of simple operation and high detection rate of bacteria, which can provide a reliable basis for clinical diagnosis of vaginal candidiasis. It is worth further clinical application.