论文部分内容阅读
今年3月,湖南人张艳胜拾到本属于中联重科融资租赁(北京)有限公司(以下简称中联重科)所有的SIM卡并使用出二十多万元的流量费,七个月后,中国移动发现巨额费用未予缴纳并向张艳胜索求,牵扯出所谓“湖南天价流量费案”。于是,本文从附随义务的角度,探寻附随义务之源及其内容与分类,进而探讨该案中附随义务关系及违反附随义务的救济方法。
In March this year, Hunan Zhang Yan wins picked up this belongs to Zoomlion Financial Leasing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zoomlion) all the SIM card and the use of more than 200,000 yuan of traffic charges, seven months later , China Mobile found that huge costs have not been paid and sought from Zhang Yansheng, involving the so-called Therefore, this article from the perspective of accompanying obligations, to explore the source of accompanying obligations, and its content and classification, and then explore the case with the accompanying obligations and the accompanying obligations in violation of relief methods.