论文部分内容阅读
基于传播技术发展与载体应用普及,知识产权诉讼最先面对来自计算机数据电文规则的挑战。电子证据保全的探索与尝试会否因法官职能行为的介入而令诉讼偏离当事人主义的轨道,这一论题不仅涉及传统司法在数字化生活背景下的适应,亦追问着司法的科学性评价与中国司法改革的取向。以司法实证为引,深入探讨技术与法律的辩证关系,解析司法的动态平衡,并对司法职能及其价值倾向给予理性阐释。
Based on the development of communication technologies and the popularity of carrier applications, intellectual property litigation is the first to face the challenge from computer data message rules. Whether the exploration and trial of the preservation of electronic evidence will cause the litigation to deviate from the doctrine of litigant because of the intervention of judicial functions and behaviors involves not only the adaptation of traditional justice in the context of digital life but also the scientific evaluation of justice and the judicial The orientation of reform. Taking judicial evidence as reference, this paper probes deeply into the dialectical relationship between technology and law, analyzes the dynamic balance of justice, and gives a rational interpretation of the judicial function and its value tendency.