论文部分内容阅读
目的分析复原力量表(CD-RISC)在民航管制学员中的适用性,考察其信度和效度等心理测量学特征,同时对民航管制学员的复原力现状进行分析。方法采用整群抽样的方式集中志愿者进行团体匿名施测,测试问卷包括CD-RISC、简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)、自尊量表(SES)和焦虑自评量表(SAS),数据分析采用验证性因素分析和相关分析的方法。结果 CD-RISC有较好的结构效度,内部一致性信度为0.882,但因素5(信念)内部一致性表现不稳定;与积极应对方式(r=0.469),社会支持(r=0.374),自尊(r=0.360)呈现出正相关,与消极应对方式(r=-0.101)和焦虑(r=-0.333)呈现出负相关,均具有统计学意义。结论 CD-RISC在民航管制学员研究中具有一定的适用性,效度较好,在稳定性方面的研究还有待于进一步深入。
Objective To analyze the applicability of the Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) to civil aviation control students and investigate the psychometric features such as reliability and validity. At the same time, the author analyzes the status quo of resilience of civil aviation control students. Methods A cluster sampling method was used to focus on volunteers for group anonymous testing. The questionnaires included CD-RISC, SCSQ, PSSS, SES and anxiety self Rating Scale (SAS), data analysis using confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis. Results The structural validity of CD-RISC was good, the internal consistency reliability was 0.882, but the internal consistency of factor 5 (belief) was not stable. Compared with the positive coping style (r = 0.469), social support (r = 0.374) , Self-esteem (r = 0.360) showed a positive correlation with negative coping style (r = -0.101) and anxiety (r = -0.333) showed a negative correlation, were statistically significant. Conclusion CD-RISC has some applicability and validity in the study of civil aviation control students, and the study of stability needs to be further studied.