论文部分内容阅读
支点是理论都有的，但又是理论所渴求的，为什么会这样呢？传统思维从支点出发，经过一番简化抽象之后，最后的结论必然与原初的支点发生矛盾润而只好放弃支点，重新再去寻求，就这样导致了理论的多元化。文艺理论研究目前的状况就是如此。尽管他们从横向到纵向、从宏观到微观、从认识论到价值论、从静态到动态、从有限到无限，可谓全方位考察文艺，但最终似乎还是不能令人满意，这不得不使我们反思传统文论的支点，咸也支点、败也支点，我们为什么不另谋它途呢？
Fulcrum is the theory, but it is the theory of the craving, why is it so? Traditional thinking starts from the fulcrum. After some simplifications and abstractions, the final conclusion inevitably contradicts with the original fulcrum and has to give up the fulcrum and seek again. This leads to the diversification of the theory. The current situation of literary theory research is the case. Although they range from the macro to the micro, from epistemology to the theory of value, from the static to the dynamic, from the limited to the infinite, it can be described as a comprehensive survey of literature and art, but in the end it seems unsatisfactory, which has forced us to reflect on the tradition Literary theory fulcrum, salty also fulcrum, defeat also fulcrum, why do not we find another way?