论文部分内容阅读
近年来根据国家教委关于“两课”改革的精神和我校的具体情况,我们在从事中国革命史教学实践中,对教学内容和教学方法及教学形式等方面都做了许多有益的尝试,并取得了初步成效,尤其在专题教学法方面取得的教学效果较为明显。但通过几年的实践我们感到这种教学方法与目前的考试制度存在着尖锐的矛盾,它已不适应专题教学的形式,应对此进行改革1.存在的问题1.1目前的考试制度与专题教学目的的矛盾 中国革命史的考试制度与其它专业课无大区别,客观性、一次性考试居主导地位。从卷面试题看:其中,第一题选择填空（10％）;第二题辨析（20％）,第三题简答（20％）,第四题问答（30％）,第五题论述（20％）。第1～4题主要是考核学生掌握历史知识的一般情况,占总成绩的80％。第五题是理论联系实际题,只占总
In recent years, according to the spirit of the “Two Courses” reform of the State Education Commission and the specific conditions of our university, we have done many beneficial attempts in the teaching of Chinese revolutionary history, teaching content, teaching methods and teaching forms, etc. The preliminary results have been achieved. The teaching effect obtained especially in the thematic teaching method is obvious. However, after several years of practice, we feel that there is a sharp contradiction between this teaching method and the current examination system. It has not adapted to the form of thematic teaching and should be reformed. 1. Existing problems 1.1 The current system of examinations and special purpose of teaching Contradictions The examination system of the Chinese revolutionary history has no big difference from other specialized courses, objectivity, and one-off examinations dominate. From the volume of test questions: Among them, the first question to choose to fill in the blank (10%); the second question discrimination (20%), the third question short answer (20%), the fourth question and answer (30% (20%). Questions 1 to 4 are mainly about students' mastery of the historical knowledge of the general situation, accounting for 80% of the total score. The fifth question is the theory of practical problems, only the total