论文部分内容阅读
对法院强制拍卖行为的定性,本质上是国家对各种利益冲突的一种选择和取舍。这是一个博弈的过程,必须理性而审慎。文章以拍定人与第三人之间的利益权衡为视角,比较分析了公法说与私法说的理论缺陷,主张法院强制拍卖应兼具公私法性质,在维护拍卖的公信力和拍定人利益的同时扩张适用善意取得制度,以此平衡拍定人和第三人的利益。
The qualitative character of the compulsory court auction is essentially a choice and choice of the state for various conflicts of interest. This is a game process, must be rational and careful. Taking the tradeoff between the claimant and the third party as the angle of view, the article compares and analyzes the theoretical flaws of public law and private law, advocating that the compulsory auction of court should have the nature of public law and private law. While maintaining the credibility of the auction and the claimant’s interests At the same time expand the application of good faith acquisition system, in order to balance the beating and the interests of third parties.