我们欢迎克留科夫的文章,原因有四。第一,从新的角度批判地考察习以为常的观点总是有益的。第二,文章再一次注意到用形态观点去认识一切重要历史现象的必要性。第三,文章提出的分类标准值得注意。第四,作者认为,随着共产主义的胜利,民族发展将开始一个新阶段。然而,在欢迎文章提出的形态观点时,我无论如何也不能同意文章对这个观点的运用。就从术语说起吧。克留科夫认为,我们不能对奴隶制和封建制部族,或资本主义和社会 We welcome Kryukov’s article for four reasons. First, it is always beneficial to critically examine commonly used ideas from a new perspective. Second, the article once again notices the necessity of recognizing all important historical phenomena from a morphological point of view. Third, the classification criteria proposed by the article is worth noting. Fourth, the author believes that with the victory of communism, ethnic development will begin a new phase. However, in welcoming the morphological point of view posed by the article, I can not at any rate agree with the article’s application of this view. Speak from the terms. Kryukov believes that we can not treat slavery and feudal clans, or capitalism and society