论文部分内容阅读
水力发电设备机组及其附属设备进行公开招标或议标时,业主一般根据招标文件评标结果选定制造厂,合同签订后,再由制造厂家进行水力开发和模型试验。自2003年起,出现了采用带模型转轮进行投标,评标阶段在第三方中立试验台进行同台对比复核试验,依据同台对比复核试验结果进行评标的方式。基于此,就这两种评标方式进行比较分析,并论述同台对比复核试验的必要性。
When a hydroelectric power generation equipment unit or its ancillary equipment conducts an open bidding or negotiation, the owner usually selects the manufacturer according to the bid evaluation results of the bidding documents. After the contract is signed, the manufacturer conducts hydraulic development and model tests. Since 2003, there has been the use of model runners bidding, bid evaluation stage in the third-party neutral test-bed comparison test on the same stage, according to the same stage comparison review test results bid way. Based on this, comparative analysis is made on the two evaluation methods, and the necessity of comparing and verifying the same test station is discussed.