我国的“非法证据排除规则”着重规定对非法言词证据的排除,体现着与我国司法现状相适应的特点。同时,新刑诉法确立的“非法证据排除规则”尚不完善,需要厘清“非法言词证据”、“刑讯逼供”等概念的外延,明确“二次自白”的效力,对言词证据之外的其他种类非法证据的排除标准作出规定。新刑诉法确立“非法证据排除规则”给检察机关的工作带来挑战,检察机关多个内设部门需要从非法证据的预防、发现、审查、排除四个方面,合力做好与新刑诉法的对接工作。 Our country “Rule of Exclusion of Illegal Evidence ” focuses on the exclusion of illegitimate evidence, which reflects the characteristics of our country’s judicial status. At the same time, the “Rule of Exclusion of Illegal Evidence” established by the new Criminal Procedure Law is not yet perfect and needs to be clarified on the concepts of “illegitimate evidence” and “confession by torture” to make it clear that “the second confession” Validity of the exclusion criteria for other types of illegitimate evidence other than verbal evidence. The establishment of the new Criminal Procedure Law “rule of exclusion of illegal evidence ” poses challenges to the procuratorial work. A number of internal departments of the procuratorial organs need to work together with new departments from the aspects of prevention, discovery, examination and exclusion of illegal evidence Criminal Procedure Law docking work.