论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜治疗卵巢良性肿瘤与开腹手术治疗卵巢良性肿瘤的临床效果。方法选取2007年4月至2010年8月就诊于我院且符合入选条件的卵巢良性肿瘤90例,分为观察组与对照组,各45例。观察组给予腹腔镜治疗卵巢良性肿瘤,对照组给予开腹手术治疗卵巢良性肿瘤,比较两组的术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间、下床时间以及术后住院天数以及观察有无脏器损伤、术后感染等并发症。结果观察组的出血量、排气时间、下床时间以及手术后住院天数均比开腹手术少(P<0.05),两组均无明显并发症发生。结论腹腔镜是一种治疗卵巢良性肿瘤安全有效的方法。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic treatment of benign ovarian tumors and open surgery for benign ovarian tumors. Methods Totally 90 benign and malignant ovarian tumors were selected in our hospital from April 2007 to August 2010, which were divided into observation group and control group, with 45 cases in each group. The observation group received laparoscopic treatment of benign ovarian tumors and the control group was treated by laparotomy for benign ovarian tumors. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, anal exhaust time, time to bed and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups Organ damage, postoperative infection and other complications. Results The bleeding volume, exhaust time, time to bed, and postoperative hospital stay in the observation group were less than those in the open surgery group (P <0.05). No significant complications occurred in both groups. Conclusion Laparoscopy is a safe and effective treatment of benign ovarian tumors.