论文部分内容阅读
李云雷(中国艺术研究院马克思主义文艺理论研究所):大家好。今天我们这次论坛请来了孟繁华老师。我认为孟老师在这两篇文章中提出的“‘50后’的终结”问题,对于我们当下的文学界是非常切中要害、抓住了核心关键的一个问题。所以我们专门组织这样一次讨论。孟繁华(沈阳师范大学中国文学与文化研究所):我说“50后”的终结,可我就是“50后”的,需要我个人首先检讨和反思:既然终结又到这来讲,这本身就是一个悖论。云雷让我讲最近发表的这两篇文章,有一篇是《学术的“通途”与
Li Yunlei (Institute of Marxist Theory of Literature and Art, Chinese Academy of Arts) Hello, everyone. Today, we invited Mr. Meng Fanghua in this forum. I think the issue of “the end of post-50s” put forward by Professor Meng in these two essays is very crucial to our current literary community and seizes one of the key issues at the core. So we specially organize such a discussion. Meng Fanghua (Shenyang Normal University, Institute of Chinese Literature and Culture): I say “the end of 50”, but I was “50 after ”, I need my first review and reflection: Since the end come here To speak of itself is a paradox. Yun Lei let me talk about these two articles recently published, one is “academic ” thoroughfare "and