美国政界和学术界对罗斯福“新政”从来毁誉不一,这里暂不作研究.解放后我国史学界一般认为“新政”是挽救美国垄断资本主义的改良措施,它不能解决资本主义社会的基本矛盾,消灭危机.这与解放前资产阶级学者对“新政”的研究相比,成绩是带根本性的.我们不同意有些同志片面强调资料,不讲立场、观点,一味贬低我国解放以来美国史研究的成绩.但三十余年来,特别是六十年代以来,我们对“新政”的评价是有些片面性的.比如,有的书说:“从罗斯 After the liberation of China’s historians generally think ”New Deal “ is an improvement measures to save the United States monopoly capitalism, it can not solve the capitalist society The basic contradictions of the crisis and the elimination of the crisis, which are quite fundamental to the study of the New Deal by bourgeois scholars before the liberation, and we do not agree that some comrades place undue emphasis on information, However, the evaluation of the ”New Deal“ has been somewhat unilateral for more than three decades, especially since the 1960s. For instance, some books say: ”From Rose