论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对牙体牙髓病病人进行根管填补治疗的功效情况展开讨论与剖析。办法:随机抽取我科室2015年2月至2016年2月期间治疗牙体牙髓病的病人80名,依据根管填补情形将病人划分为察看组与比较组,针对察看组的40名病人进行量充治疗,比较组的40名病人进行超充治疗,比较这两种根管填补治疗期间病人疼痛发生机率以及手术特效。结果 :治疗进程中,察看组术中疼痛名数2名,占比5%,明显低于比较组18名(45%),手术后察看组病人治疗的有效率(90%)显然高于比较组(52.5%),p<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论 :根管量充技术治疗特效很显然高于根管超充技术治疗特效,况且采用量充治疗办法的牙体牙髓病的病人疼痛感远低于采取超充治疗的病人,临床特效十分明显,值得大面积推广。
OBJECTIVE: To discuss and analyze the effect of root canal filling therapy on dental pulp disease patients. Methods: 80 cases of dental pulp disease were randomly selected from our department from February 2015 to February 2016. According to the situation of root canal filling, the patients were divided into observation group and comparison group, and 40 patients in observation group Quantitative treatment, 40 patients in the comparison group were overcharged, and compared the incidence of pain and surgical effects between the two kinds of canals during the treatment. Results: During the course of treatment, the number of pains in the observation group was 2, accounting for 5%, which was significantly lower than that of the comparison group (45%). The effective rate (90%) of the patients in the observation group after operation was obviously higher than that of the comparison Group (52.5%), p <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The root canal filling technique is obviously superior to the root canal filling technique in treating the special effects. In addition, the pain of patients with dental pulp disease treated by the method of filling and filling is much lower than that of the patients treated with the super filling. The clinical effect is very high Obviously, it is worth promoting a large area.