论文部分内容阅读
冷战后,“人道主义干涉”在以美国为首的西方发达国家盛行,举着人道主义保护人权的旗帜,却屡使用武力干涉他国内政,国际社会秩序受到了冲击,“不干涉内政原则”受到了空前的挑战,即使又提出了“保护的责任”的新理论,仍同样面临着道德风险和责任危机。虽然“人道主义干涉”是站在人道主义上为保护人权而提倡,但是这种理论在实践中还是暴露出各种缺陷,也没有一个良好的应对机制,其正当性受到质疑甚至是否定,各国对此的态度也各不相同。
After the Cold War, “humanitarian intervention ” prevailed in the western developed countries led by the United States, holding the banner of humanitarian protection of human rights, but repeatedly used force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and the international community was hit. “The principle of non-interference in the internal affairs Despite unprecedented challenges, the new theory of ”responsibility to protect“ is still facing the same crisis of moral hazard and responsibility. Although ”humanitarian intervention" is advocated on humanitarian grounds for the protection of human rights, this theory exposes various defects in practice and does not have a good coping mechanism. Its legitimacy is questioned or even rejected All countries have different attitudes toward this.