古人论书,简要之至,所言皆经验之谈,所语每过来人言,不求全面,直指艺心。如晋宋间人之比类,如唐宋时人之警策,如元明人之详到,莫不然尔。后世有谓大米论书以比况奇巧以指摘前人,而不知此正米氏之吊诡处。南宫耽书,而性贪,自负而有推倒一世之概,其之言,盖不可尽信也。米氏不若东坡翁之率放、涪翁之孤峭也。觉公漫录。 The ancients of the book, a brief summary, all the words are experienced in the conversation, the language of every come, do not seek comprehensive, directed at art. Such as Jin and Song class, such as the policy of the Tang and Song dynasties, such as Yuan Ming Ming detailed to, of course, Seoul. Later generations have said rice book to compare with the Kit Kat to accuse the predecessors, but I do not know this is Mikami’s paradox. Nangong Shen book, and sexual greedy, conceited and overwhelmed I, its words, can not believe too. If the rate of Mogao Dongpo Weng release, Fu Weng’s solitary cliff also. Feel the male record.