论文部分内容阅读
行为人盗窃机动车牌照之后向车主索取钱财的案例,在现实生活中并不少见。司法实务中对此存在三种不同的定性:敲诈勒索罪、盗窃罪和盗窃国家机关证件罪。经评析后认为,盗窃车牌索财行为不构成盗窃罪;当行为人的敲诈勒索行为足以使车主产生恐惧之情时,行为人分别构成盗窃国家机关证件罪和敲诈勒索罪,属牵连犯,应根据具体案情从一重从重处罚;当行为人的敲诈勒索行为不足以使车主产生恐惧之情时,仅构成盗窃国家机关证件罪。
In the real life, it is not uncommon for an actor to claim money from a vehicle owner after stealing a motor vehicle license. There are three different qualifications in judicial practice: extortion, theft and theft of documents from state organs. According to the analysis, theft of license plates does not constitute a crime of robbery. When the perpetrators’ extortion acts are enough to cause the owners to feel fear, the perpetrators constitute the crime of document theft and extortion, respectively, According to the specific case from a heavier punishment; when the perpetrator’s extortion is not enough to make the car owners fear, only constitutes a crime of theft of documents of the state organs.