论文部分内容阅读
老子其人及《老子》其书的年代问题，自五四以后，就不断发生争论。有主张春秋说者，有主张战国说者，更有主张秦汉说者。二十年代初时，钱穆提出他的新观点，主张《老子》成于战国晚期，在《庄子》内七篇之后。直至六十年代不断撰文论证，不亚二十篇之多。他的观点，无锡的另一位老庄学者蒋锡昌提出异议。在他的《老子校诂》一书的第二篇序言中系统阐释了自己的观点。他的观点和上述第一种说法相近。最近湖北荆门郭店出土了一批竹简，其中有《老子》一书的残文。经考古学者考释，认为老子先于孔子，孔子曾问学于老子是历史事实。由此也可证明蒋锡昌的观点是可以成立的。本文是对蒋的序言的解读，可以帮助读者疏理蒋锡昌的学术思想。
The issue of the age of Lao Tzu and Lao Tzu’s books has been constantly debated since the May Fourth incident. There are advocates of the Spring and Autumn said that there are advocates Warring States that more advocates of Qin and Han say. In the early 1920s, Qian Mu put forward his new viewpoint that advocating “Lao Tzu” came into being in the late Warring States period and after the seventh in “Chuang Tzu”. Until the sixties continuous author argumentation, no less than 20 articles. His point of view, another scholar in Wuxi, Chang-Chih-Chiang Chiang Chang-Chang objected. In his second preface to his book, “Lao Tzu Chi”, I systematically explained my point of view. His point of view is similar to the first one above. Recently, a group of bamboo slips were unearthed in Jingdian, Guomiao, Hubei Province, among which is the remnant of “Lao Zi”. After archeological examination, that Lao Tzu before Confucius, Confucius had asked me to learn is a historical fact. This can also prove that Jiang Xi-chang’s point of view can be established. This article is an interpretation of Jiang’s preface, which can help readers to understand Jiang Xi-chang’s academic thoughts.