论文部分内容阅读
据《中国青年报》报道,就“村官”的选举,浙江省东阳市作出规定:支持竞选人在公布执政方案时以承诺“政治善事”的方式赢得选票,候选人承诺当选期间不要报酬,或承诺个人捐资兴办公益事业、增加村民福利、以个人资产抵押发展村集体经济等,不属于贿选。但竞选者不能通过物质手段左右选民意志。因而,“送一包香烟也是贿选,修一条道路不算贿选”。乍看起来,这是一项有望取得“双赢”效果的规定:经济能人、个体工商户等财大气粗的老板如果想获得权力,可以通过此手段增加“含金量”,而村民亦有望通过将权力授予这些能人,获得
According to the “China Youth Daily” reported on the “village official” of the election, Dongyang, Zhejiang Province to make provisions: support for candidates in the announcement of the ruling program promised “political good” to win the vote, the candidate promised not to pay during the election, Or promise to donate personal funds to set up public welfare undertakings, increase the welfare of villagers, and pledge the development of village collective economy with personal assets. However, the candidate can not control the will of the voters through material means. Thus, “to send a pack of cigarettes is also a bribe, a path to repair is not a bribe.” At first glance, this is a promise of a “win-win” effect: economists, self-employed businessmen and other wealthy employers can increase their “gold content” by gaining power and villagers hope that by granting power These people, get