论文部分内容阅读
一正是无书可读的年代,于抑郁无聊中,偶而购得宋人罗泌所著《路史》一部。捧回家中,照例先看序文。序文有七篇之多。第一篇是光绪丙子赵承恩所作的《新序》。它劈头说:“士生千载后,而欲考证千载之上,难矣!况欲追求古初,搜罗于文字未兴之前,其旷远荒漠之无稽,有史氏所不能详者。……长源罗氏,生有宋乾道间,以凌铄今古之才,囊括富有,综览百代。上追古先,补史氏所未备。洵夫睥睨班马,越贾长沙而上焉。”赵承恩的这一评价,我看未免有些溢美,但也不是毫无根据的胡吹乱捧。
One is exactly the age of no books to read, depressed in the boring, and occasionally bought by Luo Song “Road History” one. Take home, as usual, look at the preamble. The essay has as many as seven. The first is the “new order” made by Zhao Cheng-en of Guangxu County. It begins to say: “After thousands of students, but for the sake of textual research, difficult to do! Condition for the pursuit of the ancient beginning, collecting before the unwinding of the text, its wilderness desert nonsense, Shih can not tell. ... Longyuan Roche, born with the Song Dao Dao, with Ling Tui ancient times before, include wealth, overview of EMI, chase the ancient first, make up the history of Shi not prepared. . ”Zhao Cheng-yen's evaluation, I think it is somewhat graceful, but not unfounded random talk.