论文部分内容阅读
目的比较多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的疗效。方法选取河池市中医医院2012年1月—2013年6月收治的支气管哮喘患者50例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各25例。观察组在常规治疗的基础上给予多索茶碱治疗,对照组在常规治疗的基础上给予氨茶碱治疗。治疗1周后,比较两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果观察组总有效率高于对照组,不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论多索茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的效果优于氨茶碱,且可有效降低不良反应发生率。
Objective To compare the efficacy of doxofylline and aminophylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Methods Fifty patients with bronchial asthma admitted from January 2012 to June 2013 in Hechi City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 25 cases in each group. The observation group was given doxofylline on the basis of routine treatment, while the control group was given aminophylline on the basis of routine treatment. After 1 week of treatment, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Doxofylline is superior to aminophylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma and can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.