《水浒》中的宋江,本是一个典型的投降派。可是过去许多关于《水浒》的评论,却把这个投降派美化为革命派,说对宋江要“一分为二”——既要看到他后期受了招安;也要看到他前期对发展梁山起义事业的贡献。所谓“壮大了起义队伍”;“取得了”多次打败官军“进剿”的“辉煌战果”;善于“团结人”,表现出“卓越的组织才能”,仍不失为一个农民起义领袖的形象,等等。这种“宋江前期有功论”,貌似公允、全面,其实是用折中主义偷换辩证法,用修正主义的阶级调和论代替马克思主义的阶级观点和阶级分析,依然是为叛徒辩护,为投降主义路线唱颂歌。 Song Jiang in Water Margin is a typical capitulationist. However, in the past many commentary on “Water Margin” turned this surrender into a revolutionary and said that it should be “divided into two” to Songjiang - Liangshan uprising contribution to the cause. The so-called “expansion of the ranks of the uprising”; “made” a “victorious success” that repeatedly defeated the “encirclement and suppression” by the government; good at “uniting people” and showing “excellent organizational skills”; and still being an image of a peasant uprising leader ,and many more. This “pre-Songjiang theory of merits,” which seems fair and comprehensive, actually uses the theory of eclecticism to steal the dialectics. The revisionist class theory of class harmony instead of Marxist class point of view and class analysis, is still a defense of the traitors, for the capitulationist Route singing.