论文部分内容阅读
程序性违法证明责任的分配机制是程序性制裁中的一个重要问题。必须根据不同性质的程序性违法行为,进行程序性违法证明责任的分配:将国家、社会、个人置于同样的利益位阶进行综合衡量,结合诉讼主体的取证能力及其与证据的距离,考量主体的取证与举证成本,通过证明责任的分配促成控辩力量的平衡,以实现形式正义与实质正义,刑事政策则为刑事程序性违法证明责任配置提供了现实依据。对于技术性程序性违法证明责任,无需证明只需补正即可;对于侵权性程序性违法的证明责任,需被追诉人承担提供初步证据的责任,可能实施程序性违法行为的公、检、法机关则承担证明责任。
The mechanism of the distribution of procedural violations of the burden of proof is an important issue in procedural sanctions. We must carry out procedural illegitimately the distribution of responsibility according to the procedural offenses of different nature: putting the state, society and individuals in the same level of interests comprehensively, combining the forensic ability of the litigant with the evidence, The main body of the evidence and the cost of proof, through the distribution of the burden of proof to promote the balance of power of prosecution and defense, in order to achieve formal justice and substantive justice, criminal policy provides a realistic basis for criminal procedural violations of the burden of proof. For technical procedural violations of the law to prove that the burden of proof is not required to be corrected; for procedural infringement of the burden of proof of the law, the prosecutor shall be liable for the provision of preliminary evidence, may implement procedural violations of public security organs Then bear the burden of proof.