论文部分内容阅读
翻开美国教育家斯特赖克和索尔蒂斯的这本书,第一节的一句话就“击”中了我。“伦理思考与伦理决策从来就不是循规蹈矩。”我疑惑了,教学伦理不就是教学中的一条条制度、一个个原则吗?怎么就不是“循规蹈矩”了呢?作者接着用一个个案例向我发起了轮番“轰炸”。约翰尼打架了,老师想和他的家长谈谈。这位家长冲进了学校,怒不可遏,表示要好好教训自己的孩子。老师为了平息家长的怒火,只好撒谎,说事情并不是约翰尼挑起的。家长马上收起了皮鞭,转变了态度,表示要叫他的儿子像个男人一样学会反击,不能像个软柿子一样任人拿捏。事情虽然就这样过去了,但老师的烦恼并没有消除,撒谎的不安长久地困扰着他,孩子们还会再相信他吗?
Open the book of American educators Stryker and Solis, the first section of the sentence “hit ” in me. “I was puzzled, teaching ethics is not a system of teaching, one by one principle? How is not ” behave “it? The author then use one by one The case launched a turn to me ”bombing". Johnny fights, and the teacher wants to talk to his parents. The parents burst into school, furious, saying that they should learn their children well. In order to quell the parents’ anger, the teacher had to lie, saying that it was not something Johnny had provoked. Parents immediately put away the whip, changed his attitude, saying that to make his son like a man learn to counterattack, not like a soft persimmon, let alone. Although things passed, but the teacher’s troubles did not eliminate the lingering unease of lying disturbed him, the children will believe him?