这似乎是一个不该问的问题,重点显然是苏轼在文末提出的主旨:事不目见耳闻,而臆断其有无,可乎?我以前也是这样教的。但现在我并不认为这是最好的选择。文章的主旨并不是一个新的见解。孔子在《论语》中就提出:“始吾于人也,听其言而信其行;今吾于人也,听其言而观其行。”孔子用对比的手法说出自己认识上的进步。看人要去三重遮蔽。一是自己的主观偏见,一是对象的自我歪曲, This seems to be a problem that should not be asked, and the focus is obviously the main thrust of Su Shi’s paper at the end of the paper: “Isn’t I seeing what I’ve seen and heard, and breaking it down?” I used to teach it as well. But now I don’t think this is the best choice. The main idea of ​​the article is not a new insight. Confucius put forward in “The Analects of Confucius”: “Beginning with my own person, I listen to his words and believe in his actions. Today, I also listen to people and listen to what they say.” Confucius expressed his knowledge with a contrasting technique. On the progress. Look for people to go to triple shielding. One is their subjective prejudice, and the other is the distortion of the subject’s self.