厦门居泰安物业管理有限公司(以下简称居泰安公司)诉上海市黄浦区市场监督管理局一案,自2002年以来,历经一审、二审和三次申请再审,行政争议始终未得到解决。最高人民法院于2012年提审本案,并于2016年2月26日作出终审判决。本案的审理主要围绕并解决三个问题。一、判决确认本案再审申请人适格居泰安公司是否为适格再审申请人,是本案的争议焦点之一。中国建设银行厦门分行(以下简称厦门建行)作为涉案羊毛的质权人,对被诉 Xiamen Habitat Property Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Habitat) v. Shanghai Huangpu District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, since 2002, after first instance, second instance and three retrial applications, the administrative dispute has not yet been resolved. The Supreme People’s Court reviewed the case in 2012 and made a final judgment on February 26, The trial of this case mainly focuses on and resolves three issues. First, the verdict confirms that the applicant for retrial in this case is eligible to be accredited or not. Habitat Accord is one of the focuses of the dispute in this case. Xiamen Branch of China Construction Bank (hereinafter referred to as Xiamen Construction Bank) as the pledges of the pledges to the accused