西方学术界对富兰克林·罗斯福战时外交的的研究大致经历以下几个时期 :第二次世界大战结束到 6 0年代中期的一致论时期 ;6 0年代中期到 70年代初期以新现实主义学派和新左派为代表的多元化解释时期 ;70年代中期到 80年代的新一致论和综合时期 ;80年代中后期重新对罗斯福外交进行回归性的批判时期和冷战后时期。由于受到国际环境、美国国内政治和罗斯福本人个性等因素的影响 ,对罗斯福战时外交的研究学派众多 ,争论激烈 ,分歧始终存在。随着时代的发展 ,跨学科和交叉学科的研究方法逐步介入 ,为罗斯福外交的研究不断开辟新的方法和途径 ,尤其冷战的结束为罗斯福外交的研究带来了新的机遇 Western academic research on Franklin D. Roosevelt’s wartime diplomacy generally experienced the following periods: the period from the conclusion of the Second World War to the mid-1960s; the consensus period between the mid-1960s and the early 1970s through the neo-realist schools and The new left represented by the pluralistic interpretation of the period; the mid-1970s to the 1980s the new consensus and the integration of the period; the late 1980s re-Roosevelt diplomacy criticism of the critical period and the post-Cold War era. Influenced by factors such as the international environment, domestic politics in the United States, and Roosevelt’s own personality, there are many studies on Roosevelt’s wartime diplomacy and the arguments are fierce. Disagreements persist. With the development of the times, interdisciplinary and interdisciplinary research methods are gradually involved, and new methods and approaches are constantly opened up for the study of Roosevelt’s diplomacy. In particular, the end of the Cold War has brought new opportunities for the study of Roosevelt’s diplomacy