黄宗智先生的文章最富于启示性的一点是:他从超越于彼此对立的现有各学派之上的方法论高度指出了各派共同基础的一系列缺陷,从而把几年前人们纷纷议论而后来一度有冷落之势的史学危机(主要是史学理论危机)的问题再次提到了国人面前,而且是以一种更富于逻辑力量的方式,这篇文章虽然谈的是中国经济史,但无疑在整个中国史领域、史学领域乃至人文科学的若干领域中也存在着类似的一系列“危机’,这决不是回避理论、像黄先生所批评的那样“倒退到纯粹的考据”去就可以解 The most enlightening point of Mr. Huang Zongzhi ’s essay is that he points out a series of flaws in the common ground of various factions from the methodology above the existing schools opposed to each other, so that people talked about it several years ago and later Once again, the issue of historical neglect (mainly the crisis of historiography theory) once again mentioned before the people and in a more logical and logical way. This article, while referring to China’s economic history, There is also a series of similar “crises” in the entire field of Chinese history, history, and even the humanities. This is by no means an evasion of the theory and can be “retrogressed to pure test” as Mr. Huang has criticized