如果物体A构成物体B,那么A与B是同一的吗?关于这一问题的“标准解释”(构成论)认为:“构成并非同一性”(即A≠B)。但构成论者对这一观点的核心论证中隐含着一个内在矛盾,即对莱布尼茨律的既肯定又否定的双重立场;并且构成论者无法合理地说明两个物体在同一时间占据同一个空间是如何可能的,因此构成论不可能成立。一个物体与构成它的物体是同一的,或者说“构成就是同一性”。 If object A constitutes object B, then A and B are the same? The “standard explanation” (constitutional) on this question holds that: “constitutes not an identity” (ie, A ≠ B). However, the core argument of the constructivist’s view implies an inherent contradiction, that is, a dual affirmation and denial of Leibniz’s law, and that the constructivist can not reasonably account for the occupancy of two objects at the same time The same space is possible, so constitution theory can not be established. An object is the same as the object that constitutes it, or “constitutes an identity.”