本文针对近年来关于东亚国家或地区经济增长“奇迹”和“神话”的争论，总结了它们的分歧所在，分析了测算要素投入与全要素生产率对经济增长贡献的方法论，指出产生“神话”观点的新古典模型的一些问题。通过描述投入、生产率变化的规律和比较，反映了东亚国家与发展中国家及发达国家增长来源上的差别。对韩国、台湾和新加坡三个样本国家和地区详细的政策分类与总结，发现它们生产率提高的基本经验是外向型战略、市场主导的产业政策或较小信贷直接分配的政府主导产业政策，稳定的宏观政策及更平等的分配政策，揭示了面对同样的外部技术而东亚却获得了成功的“秘密”。最后也提出当与发达国家“内生”的技术相比，东亚在向知识密集型产业的过渡中面临着新的技术、知识和管理瓶颈，这也是“神话”论的启示 This dissertation summarizes the disagreements over the “miracles” and “myths” of economic growth in East Asian countries in recent years, analyzes the methodology of measuring the contribution of factor inputs and total factor productivity to economic growth, and points out the viewpoints of “myths” Some problems with the neoclassical model. By describing inputs, the law and comparison of changes in productivity reflect the differences in the sources of growth of East Asian and developing countries and developed countries. The detailed policy classification and conclusion of the three sample countries and regions in Korea, Taiwan and Singapore found that the basic experience of their productivity improvement is that they are export-oriented strategies, market-led industrial policies or government-led industrial policies with relatively small direct credit distribution, and stable Macro-policies and a more equitable distribution policy revealed the “secrets” that East Asia had succeeded in facing the same external technologies. Finally, it is also proposed that East Asia faces new bottlenecks in technology, knowledge and management in the transition to knowledge-intensive industries when compared with the “endogenous” technologies in developed countries. This is also the inspiration of “mythology” theory