我在很久以前就怀疑过“老妪能解”这则典故的真实性。 我不无悲哀地想,作为文学之尊的诗歌,倘以“老妪能解”为圭桌,则谈何审美?那还有诗吗?所以说“不无悲哀”,是因为直至今日,论家谈及“老妪能解”往往贴上政治的还有经济的标签,论家是作为文学要走出“象牙之塔”、要“为人民大众服务”的社会现实课题提出来的,或者今天又换了个时髦的说法,要“贴 I long ago doubted the authenticity of this allusion that “old man can solve”. I would like to say without sorrow that as a poem of respect for literature, if we take “old man can solve” as the criterion, then what is aestheticism? And what about poetry? Therefore, saying “without sorrow” is because until now, When talking about “old man can solve” is often affixed with political and economic label, the argument is that as the literature should go out of the “ivory tower”, to “serve the public” social reality issues put forward, or today changed A fashionable statement, to "paste