近读萧瑞峰、刘成国先生《“诗盛元祐”说考辨》(以下简称萧文,见《文学遗产》2006年第2期)一文,受益良多,但亦有惑存焉,今为拈出,就教萧、刘二先生及诸方家。其一,萧文首先从陈衔的“三元”说和沈曾植“三关”说入手,认为“两说都将北宋哲宗元祐时期视为古典诗歌史上创作成就最高、最值得学习模仿的三个黄金时代之一”,并予以驳论。笔者认为萧文对陈衍和沈曾植诗论中“开 Nearly read Xiao Ruifeng, Mr. Liu Chengguo “” Shi Sheng Yuanyou “said examination” (hereinafter referred to as Xiao Wen, see “Literary Heritage” 2006 the second period) article, benefited a lot, but also confused Yan, this is Come out, they teach Xiao, Mr. Liu Er and all Fangjia. First, Xiao Wen starts with Chen’s “three yuan” theory and Shen Zengzhi’s “three levels” theory. He holds that “the two say that the period of the Northern Song Dynasty Zhezong Yuanyou is regarded as the highest achievement in the history of classical poetry and the most worthy of imitation.” One of the golden age “, and to be refuted. I believe that Xiao Wen Chen Yan and Chen Zengzhi poetry on ”open