论文部分内容阅读
一、建立案例指导制度的必要性分析案例指导制度在行政执法部门可以说是一种新兴事物,但在司法领域,这一制度已被摸索、实践多年。2005年最高人民法院发布的《人民法院第二个五年改革纲要》就提出要建立和完善案例指导制度。2010年,最高人民检察院和最高人民法院先后发布了各自的《关于案例指导工作的规定》,标志着中国特色的案例指导制度正式确立。虽然司法领域的案例指导制度和行政处罚案例指导制度在其性质、效力、意义和具体操作方法上都存在很大不同,很多问题还在争议中,但究其目的都是为了解决“同案不同罚”的问题,因此,司法领域的案例指导制度值得行政执法部门学习和借鉴。
I. The Necessity of Establishing a Case Guidance System The case guidance system can be said to be a new thing in the administrative law enforcement departments. However, in the judicial field, this system has been explored and practiced for many years. In 2005, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the “Outline for the Second Five-year Reform of the People’s Court”, which proposed to establish and improve the case guidance system. In 2010, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Supreme People’s Court successively issued their own “Provisions on Guiding Cases”, marking the formal establishment of the case guidance system with Chinese characteristics. Although the case guidance system in the field of justice and the system of case guidance for administrative penalties are very different in terms of their nature, effectiveness, significance and specific operational methods, many of the issues are still under dispute. However, their purpose is to solve the problem of “ Different punishments ”. Therefore, the case guidance system in the judicial field is worth learning and drawing lessons from the administrative law enforcement departments.