《北大法律评论》在本届编辑委员会暨主编任期内发生了一些改变,至少在外形开本和封面设计上与前几期有了很大的不同,而且进行了试验。姑且不论其他,这大概是评论自1998年创刊以来最大的一次破“例”。我深知这是一件包含很大风险的事情,因为一份刊物,无论是其面貌,还是其精神宗旨,是不能老改来换去的,那样,会让读者失去认同感而无所适从。评论的定位是一份北大法学院学生独立组织和编辑的法律学术期刊。囿于出 Peking University Law Review made some changes during the term of the editorial board and editor in chief, at least in the form and cover design with the previous period has been very different, and conducted a trial. Regardless of others, this is probably the largest comment ever made by critics since its publication in 1998. I know that this is a very risky matter because a publication, either its appearance or its spiritual purpose, can not be changed in the old way. In that case, readers will lose their identity at a loss. The review’s position is a legal academic journal independently organized and edited by Peking University Law School students.囿 out