论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨鼻内镜辅助治疗鼻出血的疗效。方法以70例鼻出血患者为研究对象,分为两组:鼻内镜下射频治疗组35例;对照组30例,以传统方法重新行鼻腔填塞或前后鼻孔填塞止血。比较两种方法的治疗效果。结果鼻内镜下射频治疗组35例中1次即止血成功33例,3例经过2次处理,均治愈;对照组中一次成功止血19例,16例再次出血,其中10例经2次填塞,4例经过3次填塞。结论鼻内镜辅助电凝止血定位准确,效果好,止血迅速,具有较好的临床应用价值。
Objective To explore the efficacy of endoscopic nasal hemorrhage. Methods 70 cases of patients with epistaxis were divided into two groups: 35 cases of nasal endoscopic radiofrequency ablation group and 30 cases of control group, re-nasal packing or nasogastric packing to stop bleeding by traditional method. Compare the therapeutic effects of both methods. Results In the group of 35 cases of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation, 33 cases were successfully stopped by hemostasis and 3 cases were cured by 2 treatments. In the control group, 19 cases were successfully stopped by hemostasis and 16 cases were hemorrhage again. 10 cases were blocked by 2 times , 4 cases after 3 times packing. Conclusions Endoscopic assisted electrocoagulation is an accurate and effective method for hemostasis and hemostasis. It has good clinical value.