论文部分内容阅读
目的分析研究在足月妊娠临产胎儿窘迫中,剖宫产术和阴道助产术两种产科手术方式的应用效果。方法取本院收治的100例在足月妊娠宫口开全时发生胎儿窘迫的产妇作为资料,其中50例采用剖宫产术,50例则采用阴道助产术,比较两组产时出血量、新生儿窒息率。结果剖宫产组产时出血量、新生儿窒息率低于阴道助产组。结论在对临产过程中出现的胎儿窘迫的治疗中,剖宫产术效果好于阴道助产术,应优先采用,并应于产妇分娩前预先做好抢救准备,降低新生儿窒息的发生。
Objective To study the effect of cesarean section and vaginal midwifery on obstetric operation in term fetal distress. Methods Totally 100 fetuses with fetus distress occurred during the full-term pregnancy cervicocele were enrolled in this study. 50 cases were treated with cesarean section, 50 cases were treated with vaginal delivery. The amount of labor-time bleeding was compared between the two groups Neonatal asphyxia rate. Results Cesarean section group of intrapartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia rate was lower than vaginal delivery group. Conclusions In the treatment of fetal distress during labor, cesarean section is better than vaginal midwifery. Priority should be given to the cesarean section, which should be prepared before delivery and reduce the incidence of neonatal asphyxia.