论文部分内容阅读
我国哲学界对于本体论问题的误解可以说是普遍性的。想当然的认为本体论就是关于本体的学问。“实践本体论”就是基于以上观点,同时借助实践范畴在人化世界的功能性作用,认为马克思主义哲学的本体论就是“实践本体论”。本文针对这种对本体论问题望文生义的理解,将尝试着从本体与本体论,以及经典著作文本出发,来澄清本体论的画像,提供一个共同的本体论话语境域。并将对于“实践本体论”所走入的误区予以剖析,认为马克思主义哲学的本体论只能是物质本体论,不可能是“实践本体论”。
My country’s philosophical misunderstanding of the ontological issue can be said to be universal. Take for granted that ontology is about ontology. “Practice ontology ” is based on the above viewpoints. At the same time, with the help of the functional role of the category of practice in the humanized world, it is believed that the ontology of Marxist philosophy is “Practical Ontology ”. In this paper, I will try to clarify the portraits of ontology from the perspectives of ontology and ontology, as well as the texts of classic writings, to provide a common context of ontology discourse. It also analyzes the misunderstanding that “practice ontology” has gone through, and holds that the ontology of Marxist philosophy can only be material ontology and can not be “practical ontology.”