论文部分内容阅读
本文以唐五代的完成貌格式“V+完+O”的形成过程为佐证,对汉语语法史上重要的语法格式“V+了+O”的来源重新进行了探讨。文章认为,鉴于“V+了+O”格式中的“V”大多是及物动词,这种格式主要是由唐五代大量出现的“Vt+了”带宾语形成的。本文和前人看法的另一个不同之处是,并不是在“了”虚化为完成体标记以后“V+了”才能带宾语,“V+了+O”格式产生之初,其中的很多“了”存在用作动相补语甚至结果补语的阶段,那种认为凡是进入“V+了+O”格式中的“了”肯定已演变为完成体标记的看法是欠妥的。文章还附带讨论了事态助词“了”的来源,认为“V+了”格式中的“了”也可直接虚化为事态助词。
This article takes the forming process of “V + End + O” in the Tang Dynasty and the Five Dynasties as the proof, and researches the origin of the important grammatical format “V + O + O” in the history of Chinese grammar. The article argues that since the “V” in the “V + + O” format is mostly a transitive verb, this format is mainly formed by the “Vt +” object appearing in the Tang and the Five Dynasties. Another difference between this paper and the previous one is that it is not possible to bring an object with “V + ” after the virtualization completes the body marking and the beginning of the generation of the “V + + O” format , Many of them exist as phases of motive complement or even result complements, and those who think that any “” entry “in the” + + + “format must have evolved to complete the body mark The opinion is defective. The article also includes a discussion of the source of the state adverb ”a “ and holds that ”a “ in ”V + " can also be directly reduced to a state particle.