论文部分内容阅读
以某门课程来体现学校单一特色的做法,并不能真正推进学校课程建设,甚至可能会损害学校课程的整体性及其教育功能。相较于开发几门校本课程而言,学校成为课程管理的主体,具有更重要的意义。强调国家课程的重要性,并不是说它只能照原样被“忠实执行”。基础教育课程改革的初期,学习方式的变革是主流,“自主、合作、探究”是课改关注的重点、努力的方向。课改十多年之后,学校
The practice of using a course to reflect the unique characteristics of a school can not really promote the construction of a school curriculum. It may even undermine the integrity of the school curriculum and its educational functions. Compared with the development of several school-based curriculum, the school has become the subject of curriculum management, has more significance. Emphasizing the importance of a national curriculum does not mean that it can only be “faithfully executed” as it is. In the early stage of basic education curriculum reform, the transformation of learning styles is the mainstream, “autonomy, cooperation, exploration ” is the focus of curriculum reform, the direction of efforts. Less than ten years after class, school