论文部分内容阅读
目的对比血管超声与64排CT血管造影对颈动脉狭窄的诊断效果。方法 150例颈动脉狭窄患者均接受血管超声及64排CT血管造影检查,指定具有专业知识及丰富经验的临床医生完成相关操作,所得图像应由3位或以上影像学检查医生经双盲阅片后得出诊断结论。结果 150例颈动脉狭窄患者经不同方法检查可知,血管超声对颈动脉狭窄诊断正确率(97.33%)高于64排CT血管造影(检出率80.67%),对比结果差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论颈动脉狭窄患者经血管超声检查可以显著地提高其临床检出率,有利于患者获得及时救治,减少脑血管疾病发生率。
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of vascular ultrasound and 64-slice CT angiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Methods All 150 patients with carotid artery stenosis underwent vascular ultrasonography and 64-slice CT angiography. Clinicians with specialized knowledge and extensive experience were required to complete related operations. The resulting images should be screened by three or more radiologists After the conclusion of the diagnosis. Results 150 cases of carotid stenosis were examined by different methods. The diagnostic accuracy of vascular ultrasound for carotid stenosis (97.33%) was higher than that of 64-slice CT angiography (detection rate was 80.67%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Carotid stenosis in patients with vascular ultrasound can significantly improve the clinical detection rate, help patients get timely treatment and reduce the incidence of cerebrovascular disease.