论文部分内容阅读
本刊自去年九月号发表了万繩南同志的“论隋煬帝”之后,引起了广大读者的热烈辩论,先后收到稿件甚多,其中对对万繩南同志意见表示支持者仅是少数的、个别的;绝大多数同志对万同志的意见都抱着相反的态度,我们按照收到来稿次序先后,在本刊去年十二月号和本年一月号发表了两篇,到现在万同志还没有进行反驳,而来稿意见的论点又大致是相同的。为了节省读者的宝贵时间和节省篇幅起见,我们仅从来稿中选辑一些意见发表,说明大家对隋煬帝评介问题的般看法,其余恕不一一发表。意见可以分两部分,一部分是理论观点方面的,—部分是关于论点方面的。
Since the publication of Comrade Wan Shengnan's “On Emperor Sui” in September of this year, the magazine has aroused heated debates from readers and received many manuscripts. Among them, only a few supporters expressed their opinions about Comrade Wan Shengnan The vast majority of comrades hold the opposite attitude toward the opinions of Comrade Wan. According to the order of receipt of contributions, we published two articles in December of this year and January of this year and now, Comrades Wan has not yet rebutted, and the arguments for his contributions are broadly the same. In order to save the precious time of readers and save space, we only publish some opinions from the drafts to explain the general viewpoints on the evaluation of Emperor Sui and the rest will not be published one by one. Opinion can be divided into two parts, one part of the theoretical point of view, - part of the argument is about.