论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨PVP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的价值。方法:收集我院骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者,分为:研究组(治疗方案为PVP手术)和对照组(治疗方案为保守治疗)。对比(1)两组治疗前、治疗3月椎体高度。(2)两组治疗前、治疗3月疼痛评分和JOA评分。结果:(1)两组治疗前椎体高度比较无差异(P>0.05);两组治疗3月椎体高度比较有差异(P<0.05)。(2)两组治疗前疼痛评分和JOA评分比较无差异(P>0.05);两组治疗3月疼痛评分和JOA评分结果比较有差异(P<0.05)。结论:PVP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎椎体压缩骨折疗效肯定,对缓解患者疼痛与改善症状有重要的作用。
Objective: To investigate the value of PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods: We collected osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in our hospital and divided them into study group (PVP surgery) and control group (conservative treatment). Comparison (1) two groups before treatment, treatment of vertebral height in March. (2) The pain score and JOA score of the three groups before treatment were compared. Results: (1) There was no difference in vertebral body height between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). The vertebral body height of the two groups was significantly different at March (P <0.05). (2) There was no significant difference between the two groups in pre-treatment pain score and JOA score (P> 0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups in March pain score and JOA score (P <0.05). Conclusion: PVP is effective in treating osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures and plays an important role in relieving pain and improving symptoms in patients.