读了杨知勇同志写的《崩龙族文学概况》(见《思想战线》1979年第六期),既感到欣喜,但同时也感到《概况》中有的论点不符合实际。现提出两点,与杨知勇同志商榷。《概况》的第一部份提到:“崩龙族没有书面文学,没有专门的歌手……。”这是不合乎崩龙族文学实际的。诚然,崩龙族没有自己的文字。但是,长期以来他们一直使用傣哪文。他们不仅用它来记录口头文学,还用它创作文学作品。这些书面文学作品,虽经林彪、“四人帮”的鬼火焚毁了一些,但仍有许多珍藏在崩龙族群众家里。因此,我们认为,无 Having read the “Overview of the Literature of the Collaacons” written by Comrade Yang Zhiyong (see “The Ideological Front”, Issue 6, 1979), both of us are delighted but feel that some of the arguments in the General Survey are not realistic. Now put forward two points, to discuss with Comrade Yang Zhiyong. The first part of the profile mentions: “The Vanguard has no written literature and no dedicated singer ....” This is out of accord with Vulcan literary practice. Indeed, the collapse of the dragon did not own the text. However, they have been using Dai for a long time. They not only use it to record oral literature, but also use it to create literary works. Although these written literary works have been burnt down by the spirits of Lin Biao and the “gang of four,” there are still many treasures collected in the families of the tribal peoples. So, we think, no