论文部分内容阅读
本文列举几个对奴隶制真实性及其在人类历史中的地位予以否认的例子,从概念角度研究了这几个例子的理性地位,指出这类否认不仅仅是做了一点修改,它们还大量删减史实,严重歪曲史实。本文先讨论形式逻辑否定词的使用和滥用情况,然后研究两个“突出”的例子:一是南非否认奴隶制,二是戴维.欧文否认纳粹大屠杀。笔者的结论是:(1)这些否认说都是非理性的实例,虽然尚未达到当代临床医学上讲的精神错乱的程度;(2)对这类否认所做的正确回应是将否认者从理性话语的圈子里清除出去。
This article gives several examples of the authenticity of slavery and its position in human history. It examines the rational positions of these examples from a conceptual point of view, pointing out that such denials are more than merely amending a few, Reduce the historical facts, seriously distort the facts. This article first discusses the use and abuse of formal logic negatives, and then examines two examples of “prominence”: one is denial of slavery in South Africa; and the other is that David Owen denies the Holocaust. The author’s conclusions are: (1) These denials are all irrational examples, though the degree of mental disorder in contemporary clinical medicine has not yet been reached; (2) The correct response to such denials is to exclude the denial from rational discourse Clear out of the circle.