论文部分内容阅读
报告了用自行研制的Ｍａｃｒｏ精子计数板与Ｍａｋｌｅｒ精子计数板和血细胞计数板分析３份不同精液的精子密度、活率和运动速度，结果Ｍａｃｒｏ板与Ｍａｋｌｅｒ板之间无显著性差异。在一定的密度范围内，Ｍａｃｒｏ板、Ｍａｋｌｅｒ板与血细胞计数板计数精子密度结果无显著性差异；精子密度过低（＜３０×１０６／ｍｌ）或过高（＞１４０×１０６／ｍｌ），精子密度计数结果Ｍａｃｒｏ板和Ｍａｋｌｅｒ板均与血细胞计数板有极显著差异。就重复性而言，Ｍａｃｒｏ板和Ｍａｋｌｅｒ板均优于血细胞计数板。结果表明：Ｍａｃｒｏ板完全可以替代Ｍａｋｌｅｒ板用于精液分析。
The use of self-developed Macro sperm count plates with Makler sperm count plates and hemacytometer plates to analyze the sperm density, viability, and speed of motion in 3 different semen shows no significant difference between Macro plates and Makler plates. Within a certain density range, there was no significant difference in the sperm density counts on the Macro plate, Makler plates, and blood cell count plates; the sperm density was too low (<30×106/ml) or too high (>140×106/ml) for sperm Densitometry results Macro and Makler plates were significantly different from the hemacytometer plates. In terms of repeatability, Macro plates and Makler plates are superior to blood cell count plates. The results show that the Macro plate can completely replace the Makler plate for semen analysis.