从今年双月诗刊《扬子江》二期拜读了石一龙先生针对一期《诗的缺席与作者到位的诗奖》而来的《常识的缺席与棍子的到位》之反批评 ,眼界大开。本来可以正常的批评与反批评 ,在作者抡着棍子先发制人 ,贼喊捉贼地反说别人是“棍子”时 ,有人大概要为如此的战略战术所展示的高才? From the second issue of the bimonthly “Yangtze River” this year, I read Shi Shi Long’s anti-criticism of “The Absence of Commonsense and the Place of Sticks” in response to the issue of “Poetry Prize in the Absence of Poetry and Author in Place”. Criticism and counter-criticism, which could have been normal, could be seen as normal when the author pretended to be preemptive, thief shouted and thwarted that others were “sticks.”