论文部分内容阅读
技术标准制定进程中,专利权人违反专利信息披露义务,故意诈欺的行为,会误导标准的选择与设定、阻碍市场竞争,从而导致各国的反垄断规制。美国《谢尔曼法》第2条对标准制定中所有参与人的诈欺行为进行规制,而不考虑参与人最初的市场支配力水平。当原告有充分的证据证明专利权人的诈欺行为对市场竞争造成损害,并通过反竞争的方法获得市场支配地位时,专利权人需承担反垄断责任。欧盟竞争法对标准制定中反垄断的规制对象分两类进行规制,即诈欺时具有市场支配地位的专利权人和诈欺时无市场支配地位的专利权人。同时,在反垄断规制中,要求原告灵活举证专利权人存在不良行为、专利权人的诈欺行为具有反竞争效果、并将专利权人因缺乏反竞争意图而不披露相关专利信息的行为排除在反垄断规制之外。
In the process of technical standard-setting, the patentee’s violation of patent information disclosure obligations and intentional fraud will mislead the selection and setting of standards and hinder market competition, thus leading to antitrust regulation in various countries. Article 2 of the United States “Sherman Act” regulates the fraudulent conduct of all participants in the standard-setting without regard to the original level of market power of the participants. When the plaintiff has sufficient evidence that the patentee’s fraud causes damage to the market competition and gains market dominance through anti-competitive methods, the patentee needs to bear antitrust obligations. The EU competition law regulates the object of antitrust regulation in standard setting in two categories: the patentee who has the dominant market position in the fraud and the patentee who does not have the market dominance in the fraud. At the same time, in the antitrust regulation, the plaintiff is required to flexibly prove that the patentee has bad behavior and the patentee’s fraud behavior has the anticompetitive effect and excludes the patentee from not disclosing the related patent information because of the lack of anticompetitive intention Outside antitrust regulation.